Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:07:45 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: STLport On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 02:00:53PM +1100, Grant Gray wrote: > Licensing is the issue. I'm building a userland free of copyleft > code, which rules out libstdc++. I haven't investigated libc++, but > I have no allegiance to STLport so will look into it. I think libc++ would be a much better choice. Even if it ends up being more work, it's actually modern/up-to-date and it's a library everybody wants to support anyway. And it purportedly aims to be portable (not sure if this is really true), so it shouldn't be so bad to get it working with musl. > Is anyone already working on a libc++ integration with musl? I know several people have experimented with using llvm/clang with musl, but I don't know what the status on libc++ is. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.