Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:33:00 +0600 From: agent <agentprog@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: STLport 31.12.2012 09:00, Grant Gray пишет: > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:11:18PM +1100, Grant Gray wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > > > Is anyone working on getting STLport working with musl? > > > > > > I had a quick look at the STLport sources and it seems to assume > > glibc is in use if the toolchain is GCC, so it seems some porting > > effort is required to get it working with musl. > > Is there a reason you want to use STLport rather than libstdc++ or > libc++? My impression was that STLport was outdated, unmaintained, and > full of ugly legacy hackery from the 90s... > > Rich > > Licensing is the issue. I'm building a userland free of copyleft code, > which rules out libstdc++. I haven't investigated libc++, but I have > no allegiance to STLport so will look into it. > > Is anyone already working on a libc++ integration with musl? > i have tried to build the whole stack: clang, libc++, libc++abi with musl, though i got stuck with libunwind for libc++abi. libc++ compiled fine when using libsupc++, but i didn't test it anyhow (maybe it is even unusable). i'm going to try out clang + libc++ + libcxxrt + musl soon.they say libc++ works with libcxxrt and libcxxrt has it's own unwind. Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.