Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 14:00:53 +1100 (EST) From: Grant Gray <grant@...y.id.au> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: STLport > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:11:18PM +1100, Grant Gray wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > > > Is anyone working on getting STLport working with musl? > > > > > > I had a quick look at the STLport sources and it seems to assume > > glibc is in use if the toolchain is GCC, so it seems some porting > > effort is required to get it working with musl. > Is there a reason you want to use STLport rather than libstdc++ or > libc++? My impression was that STLport was outdated, unmaintained, > and > full of ugly legacy hackery from the 90s... > Rich Licensing is the issue. I'm building a userland free of copyleft code, which rules out libstdc++. I haven't investigated libc++, but I have no allegiance to STLport so will look into it. Is anyone already working on a libc++ integration with musl? Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.