Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 02:01:06 +0100 From: Ismael Luceno <ismael@...ev.co.uk> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Announcing an argp-standalone fork On 10/Feb/2021 20:36, Érico Nogueira wrote: > Hi! > > So, the current argp-standalone version used by at least Void, Alpine > and possibly FreeBSD (though I don't know the best way to contact > them) has a few tiny issues here and there. The one I experienced was > that unning elfutils' `eu-elfclassify --help` resulted in a segfault. > > Since argp-standalone upstream has been inactive for a long time, and > I couldn't find any other forks, I decided to do it myself, and try to > bring it in line with what glibc currently has. > > > > The results are in https://github.com/ericonr/argp-standalone > > if anyone else wants to try it / verify my work. I also imported quite > a few trivial and stylistic glibc changes in order to keep the diff > with future glibc as small as possible, which should make updating the > library reasonably simple. > > There is still this FreeBSD patch that I haven't imported: > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/devel/argp-standalone/files/patch-argp-help.c?view=log > > I should be switching Void to this fork in the short term, as well. > > Cheers, and hope this can be useful for someone, > Érico Have you seen <https://github.com/xhebox/libuargp>?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.