Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:10:55 -0700 From: Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: clockspeed On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:04:36PM -0700, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> Has anyone compiled clockspeed against musl, in a x86_64? > > I'm guessing you mean DJB's package, Indeed. but the name is generic enough > that I can't be sure. Next time try to be more clear. I had no idea there was some other package with the same name. > >> If so, would you share conf-cc and conf-ld? > > I just did as a test and it has some obvious issues like missing and > wrong prototypes for standard functions and "extern int errno;" rather > than #include <errno.h> (the latter is DJB's willfully wrong code to > make a point that he likes being wrong), but it compiled "ok" after > changing error.h. No idea if it works. > > I didn't modify conf-cc or conf-ld at all because the native gcc > targets musl, but if you wanted to cross-compile it would probably > work putting the name of your cross compiler there, or the musl-gcc > wrapper even. > I'm not cross-compiling, but the distro is not musl-based. Yes, I put the wrapper in conf-cc and conf-ld. I've been using clockspeed for years (with < 5ms discrepancy relative to the NTP server, on crappy hardware). But I had it compiled against dietlibc long ago (in x86), and now it doesn't compile against dietlib nor against musl. Just wondering if x86_64 brings about some extra problem. Jorge
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.