Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:52:29 +0200 From: Jason Ramapuram <jason.ramapuram@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: Jason Ramapuram <jason.ramapuram@...il.com> Subject: Regarding whole-archive linking libc.a into a shared lib Hello there, Is it at all possible to link musl's libc.a statically into a shared lib? After a lot of trying I either get relocation errors (when using musl-gcc built on say centos7) as such ( http://stackoverflow.com/questions/38251344/musl-fails-to-link-libc-a-into-shared-library) or hidden symbols not being defined like below (when using Alpine linux) : /home/buildozer/aports/main/musll/src/musl-1.1.12/src/ldso/x86_64/tlsdesc.s:36: undefined reference to `__tls_get_new' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/5.3.0/../../../../x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/bin/ld: tgt/Linux-x86_64/mylib/lib/mylib.so: hidden symbol `__tls_get_new’ isn't defined /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/5.3.0/../../../../x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Makefile:58: recipe for target ‘tgt/Linux-x86_64/mulib/lib/mylib.so’ failed make: *** [tgt/Linux-x86_64/mylib/lib/mylib.so] Error 1 I understand this might conflict when someone tries to link against this and libc.so from a binary, however would it be possible somehow to mangle all the libc calls internally inside the shared lib? Is there a tool that would be able to do this? It would be really nice to have a portable shared lib that has libc built in. Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.