Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:59:44 +0200 From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@...too.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: New Exherbo+musl stage: x86_64-pc-linux-musl-20160621 On 22/06/16 17:57, Matias A. Fonzo wrote: > El Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:32:47 +0200 > Shiz <hi@...z.me> escribió: >>> On 22 Jun 2016, at 17:20, Matias A. Fonzo <selk@...gora.org> wrote: >>> >>> Distribute files and impose to your users in having xz, is a bad >>> idea. >> >> I don’t think you understand what I said. Technical arguments about >> the superiority of your format aren’t particularly relevant if the >> user can’t decompress it in the first place. >> >> - Shiz >> > > I understand that you are losing in make the right thing just for the > availability of a bad implementation. If the user can't decompress is > really your main concern, think in the RAM usage as a possible > limitation (among other things). > The format seems a little too new and you seem to derail the discussion in a mailing list unrelated to the main project (exherbo). Would you please stop flaming? xz took a lot of time to supplant bzip2 mainly because to make it viable you would need to provide alternatives. You might suggest to look at the format and help spreading the mindshare or act like a bully and make people consider the whole thing bad marketing and start ignoring you and your proposals like it is spam. my 2 cents. lu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.