Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:57:04 -0300 From: "Matias A. Fonzo" <selk@...gora.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: New Exherbo+musl stage: x86_64-pc-linux-musl-20160621 El Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:32:47 +0200 Shiz <hi@...z.me> escribió: > > On 22 Jun 2016, at 17:20, Matias A. Fonzo <selk@...gora.org> wrote: > > > > Distribute files and impose to your users in having xz, is a bad > > idea. > > I don’t think you understand what I said. Technical arguments about > the superiority of your format aren’t particularly relevant if the > user can’t decompress it in the first place. > > - Shiz > I understand that you are losing in make the right thing just for the availability of a bad implementation. If the user can't decompress is really your main concern, think in the RAM usage as a possible limitation (among other things). -- GPG pub ID = 0x3AAF1CEC203A99D5 Key servers = hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net - keys.gnupg.net Key fingerprint = 35BD B9D4 6B56 B5FA CB64 7C9B 3AAF 1CEC 203A 99D5 Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.