Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:57:04 -0300
From: "Matias A. Fonzo" <>
Subject: Re: New Exherbo+musl stage: x86_64-pc-linux-musl-20160621

El Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:32:47 +0200
Shiz <> escribió:
> > On 22 Jun 2016, at 17:20, Matias A. Fonzo <> wrote:
> > 
> > Distribute files and impose to your users in having xz, is a bad
> > idea.  
> I don’t think you understand what I said. Technical arguments about
> the superiority of your format aren’t particularly relevant if the
> user can’t decompress it in the first place.
> - Shiz

I understand that you are losing in make the right thing just for the
availability of a bad implementation.  If the user can't decompress is
really your main concern, think in the RAM usage as a possible
limitation (among other things).

GPG pub ID = 0x3AAF1CEC203A99D5
Key servers = -
Key fingerprint = 35BD B9D4 6B56 B5FA CB64  7C9B 3AAF 1CEC 203A 99D5

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.