Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 16:03:20 +0800
From: 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo)  <luoyonggang@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: There is no tests for musl,

Understood, Indeed, I wanna to port musl to win32, doesn't know if
that's was a good idea.

2015-05-08 16:01 GMT+08:00 Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>:
> * ?????????(Yonggang Luo)  <luoyonggang@...il.com> [2015-05-08 15:38:33 +0800]:
>> That's really not so good for the stable.
>>
>
> it is a good thing
>
> a libc should provide portable semantics so implementation
> independent tests should be used not "tests for musl"
>
> http://wiki.musl-libc.org/wiki/Libc-Test



-- 
         此致
礼
罗勇刚
Yours
    sincerely,
Yonggang Luo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.