Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 16:03:20 +0800 From: 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: There is no tests for musl, Understood, Indeed, I wanna to port musl to win32, doesn't know if that's was a good idea. 2015-05-08 16:01 GMT+08:00 Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>: > * ?????????(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang@...il.com> [2015-05-08 15:38:33 +0800]: >> That's really not so good for the stable. >> > > it is a good thing > > a libc should provide portable semantics so implementation > independent tests should be used not "tests for musl" > > http://wiki.musl-libc.org/wiki/Libc-Test -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.