Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 10:01:24 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: There is no tests for musl, * ?????????(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang@...il.com> [2015-05-08 15:38:33 +0800]: > That's really not so good for the stable. > it is a good thing a libc should provide portable semantics so implementation independent tests should be used not "tests for musl" http://wiki.musl-libc.org/wiki/Libc-Test
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.