Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 16:50:30 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Musl + TCC On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 09:07:55AM +1300, Andre Renaud wrote: > Hi, > Has anyone had a go at building musl with Tiny-CC http://bellard.org/tcc/? > > I was trying to see what the smallest self-hosting Linux system I > could make was, but had grief building musl due to TCC's lack of > complex support (which is relatively easily removed from musl, just a > couple of #includes and removing the src/complex directory). I then > had problems with <stdarg.h> (va_list not being properly defined), and > finally a crash in tcc which I couldn't quite track down. Before I get > into it too much more, I was wondering if anyone had done this before? Could you elaborate on the stdarg.h problem? It might just work to use the legacy non-GNUC definitions. I can't recall whether anyone has successfully built musl with tcc. My guess would be that the dynamic linking doesn't work, but static linking might. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.