[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 16:50:30 -0500
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Musl + TCC
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 09:07:55AM +1300, Andre Renaud wrote:
> Hi,
> Has anyone had a go at building musl with Tiny-CC http://bellard.org/tcc/?
>
> I was trying to see what the smallest self-hosting Linux system I
> could make was, but had grief building musl due to TCC's lack of
> complex support (which is relatively easily removed from musl, just a
> couple of #includes and removing the src/complex directory). I then
> had problems with <stdarg.h> (va_list not being properly defined), and
> finally a crash in tcc which I couldn't quite track down. Before I get
> into it too much more, I was wondering if anyone had done this before?
Could you elaborate on the stdarg.h problem? It might just work to use
the legacy non-GNUC definitions. I can't recall whether anyone has
successfully built musl with tcc. My guess would be that the dynamic
linking doesn't work, but static linking might.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
