Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:53:04 +0100 From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@...too.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Musl + TCC On 09/02/14 22:43, Rich Felker wrote: > On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 09:15:28PM +0100, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: >> 2014-02-09 21:07 GMT+01:00 Andre Renaud <andre@...ewatersys.com>: >>> Hi, >>> Has anyone had a go at building musl with Tiny-CC http://bellard.org/tcc/? >> >> and libfirm/cparser? :) >> http://pp.ipd.kit.edu/firm/ > > If I remember correctly, last I checked, libfirm/cparser was working > fine for static linking, but did not support dynamic linking (it > completely lacked position-independent code generation, i.e. -fPIC). > There were some problems with complex and some floating point things, > but I think they were all fixed. I built a static libc.a with cparser > and the results passed basic testing. > > This is definitely the most promising GCC-alternative compiler I've > seen, so if anybody's up for helping promote it and/or contribute to > the project, that would be great. I contributed a bit and I'm routinely filling bugs to it. It is indeed easy to work with and the upstream developers are pleasant to work with. They indeed need more mindshare. I hope once they converted cparser to an usable library they'll bloom fully. lu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.