Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 16:43:08 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Musl + TCC On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 09:15:28PM +0100, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: > 2014-02-09 21:07 GMT+01:00 Andre Renaud <andre@...ewatersys.com>: > > Hi, > > Has anyone had a go at building musl with Tiny-CC http://bellard.org/tcc/? > > and libfirm/cparser? :) > http://pp.ipd.kit.edu/firm/ If I remember correctly, last I checked, libfirm/cparser was working fine for static linking, but did not support dynamic linking (it completely lacked position-independent code generation, i.e. -fPIC). There were some problems with complex and some floating point things, but I think they were all fixed. I built a static libc.a with cparser and the results passed basic testing. This is definitely the most promising GCC-alternative compiler I've seen, so if anybody's up for helping promote it and/or contribute to the project, that would be great. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.