Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 10:06:18 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: musl path On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 12:46:47PM +0200, Jens Staal wrote: > I would definitely like the idea of the wrapper being a general tool > for various libc's. > > Especially nice in order to play with the libc benchmarks (I tried > making AURs for them but could not figure out how to get the different > builds to use the different libcs installed on the system). > > If the wrappers also could include a number of different compilers, > that would be great :) I think for most compilers it's trivial. As far as I know, gcc is the only one I know that insists on still passing all the unwanted -L paths to the linker even when you told it -nostdlib... Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.