[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 10:06:18 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: musl path
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 12:46:47PM +0200, Jens Staal wrote:
> I would definitely like the idea of the wrapper being a general tool
> for various libc's.
>
> Especially nice in order to play with the libc benchmarks (I tried
> making AURs for them but could not figure out how to get the different
> builds to use the different libcs installed on the system).
>
> If the wrappers also could include a number of different compilers,
> that would be great :)
I think for most compilers it's trivial. As far as I know, gcc is the
only one I know that insists on still passing all the unwanted -L
paths to the linker even when you told it -nostdlib...
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
