Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 22:35:20 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@...il.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, ast@...com, Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@...il.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>, andrew@...n.ch Subject: Re: arch: arm: bpf: Converting cBPF to eBPF for arm 32 bit On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@...il.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote: >> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Shubham Bansal >> <illusionist.neo@...il.com> wrote: >>> I would post them as soon as I test them on ARMv5 and ARMv6. If you >>> can help me with that, please let me know. >> >> Please post what you have: it would be better to see what you've got >> now in case additional changes are needed so you don't have to do it >> again on v5 and v6. Also, it means other people with real v5 and v6 >> hardware could test for you if they were so inclined, and you won't >> need to be blocked on doing the tests in qemu. >> >> You can send it as an "RFC" in the subject, just to make sure people >> know it's not considered fully done. :) > > I already have ARMv5 and ARMv6 code written. I just haven't tested it > yet. Should i send the patch with those as well ? Sure, just to have a version up for people to examine. If there are bugs, that's fine, we'll iron them out. -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.