Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 19:19:04 +0200 From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@...tomas.sk> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: GPU benchmarks? >On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 08:16:22PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> are you guys intertested in putting GPU benchmarks to wiki? On 22.10.21 16:54, Solar Designer wrote: >Maybe. The existing list of selected CPU benchmarks is certainly quite >dated and weird, comparing CPUs with GPUs ans FPGAs with the same hashes could give us better idea what (not) to use them for. > and it's also weird we don't have any for GPU and FPGA >in there. that's why I'm asking. BTW, do LWS and GWS matter here? shopuld they be at least shown in the output? >> If so, which hashes should be interesting to put there? > >All of them, but that would mean either just uploading entire redirected >output from "--test --format=opencl" (which may actually be a reasonable >thing to do) or setting up some automated processing of such files to >present the results as a table. for visual comparison, a table would be nice. >So if selecting just some, I guess it'd be the various crypt(3) hash >types, NT, LM, WPA-PSK, Bitcoin, archives... and this already feels a >bit too many for manual entry. Maybe also include phpass and Drupal7, >for comparison against their speeds on FPGA. so we could start with same hashes as CPU tables have.. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@...tomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. I intend to live forever - so far so good.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.