|
Message-ID: <feot1brgnet42ugocmojsrdh.1635181754364@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 19:09:14 +0200 From: Jirka Vejrazka <jirka.vejrazka@...il.com> To: "'john-users_lists.openwall.com'" <john-users@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: lanman == LM ? LM is lanman Original Message From: uhlar@...tomas.sk Sent: 25 October 2021 19:04 To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Reply to: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: [john-users] lanman == LM ? Hi, as the subject says: does lanman mean LM or does my build miss lanman support somehow? (how do I test lanman speed if it's not LM?) thanks -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@...tomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "To Boot or not to Boot, that's the question." [WD1270 Caviar]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.