Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 02:14:10 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Problem with AMD and recent Patch On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 02:30:42PM +0100, Marc Brinkmann wrote: > marc@...berd:~/JohnTheRipper/run$ ./john --test --format=office2010-opencl > OpenCL platform 0: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing, 2 device(s). > Using device 0: Juniper > Local worksize (LWS) 64, Global worksize (GWS) 4096 > Benchmarking: Office 2010 SHA-1 AES (100,000 iterations) [OpenCL 4x]... DONE > Raw: 5251 c/s real, 364088 c/s virtual > > marc@...berd:~/JohnTheRipper/run$ > > It's working like a charm :) > So as i said thanks for your patience and great work!! > And tba. 364k c/s seems a lot more promissing, than the 120 my ION Chip can > handle :D The real speed is 5251 c/s. The "virtual" speed is measured in CPU time, not in real time. When you're using a GPU, you may be using less than 100% of a CPU core's time (often a lot less), hence the higher virtual speed figure per CPU time consumed. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.