[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 11:19:07 +1000
From: Philip Rhoades <phil@...com.com.au>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: First post - OWL looks really nice! - Q1
People,
OK, I have made a little progress - this my current OWL VM ifcfg-eth0:
DEVICE=eth0
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=192.168.122.206
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=192.168.122.0
BROADCAST=192.168.122.255
GATEWAY=192.168.122.1
DNS1=192.168.122.1
and this allows me to ping and ssh into it from my F31 workstation but I
still can't ping anything from it . . what am I missing?
Thanks,
Phil.
On 2020-07-04 03:10, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> People,
>
> I have been committed to RH and then Fedora since RH4 and FC1 for my
> general purpose workstations and servers and I have always wanted a
> Fedora Minimal iso - then when I went looking for non-systemd
> Fedora-based stuff I found OWL! - this should be very interesting for
> me.
>
> First Q - for networking I tried:
>
> 192.16.1.*
>
> (my LAN) and
>
> 192.16.122.*
>
> for the default virt-manager networking - I installed on a VM for a
> first look but neither of those addressing schemes work - what do I
> need to do to get the VM networking going?
>
> I am also interested in using OWL for podman containers - I presume
> there will also be a networking issue there too?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Phil.
--
Philip Rhoades
PO Box 896
Cowra NSW 2794
Australia
E-mail: phil@...com.com.au
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
