Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:31:06 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: CVE-2013-4402 GnuPG infinite recursion in the compressed packet parser

Hi,

As many of you know, GnuPG 1.4.15 was released a few days ago with:

  * Fixed possible infinite recursion in the compressed packet
    parser. [CVE-2013-4402]

http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2013q4/000334.html

There's now a nice writeup by Taylor R. Campbell, who invented the
attack on GnuPG, and it applies to more than just GnuPG:

http://mumble.net/~campbell/blag.txt

I'll quote it below for those reading oss-security archives a while
later, not to rely on it still being near the beginning of blag.txt.

---
2013-10-08 On compression in data formats

   If you have a large message which you want to sign and encrypt with
   OpenPGP, you might compress it first.  Or you might compress it
   second.  Or, if you're not thinking much about it, you might
   `compress' it last, although if that actually reduces the size
   there are some cryptographers who would like to have a word with
   you.

   In any case, the OpenPGP message format lets you do any of these,
   because there is a type of OpenPGP packet for compressed data,
   whose content is interpreted as another OpenPGP packet.  OpenPGP
   agents, such as GnuPG, are expected to recursively process packets
   they encounter in a message, decrypting ciphertext and verifying
   signatures and decompressing compressed data, until they hit a
   ground case, usually a literal data packet.

   Since messages are built up by starting with a literal data packet
   and layering encryption, signature, and compression atop it, this
   process should always halt at a ground case, right?  Well, no.
   Decryption and verification (or, removing a signature) always yield
   smaller packets than you began with, so there has to be a ground
   case for those, but decompressing usually yields a larger packet
   than you began with.

   So you might play a cruel trick on your friend by sending a very
   small email with a compressed packet that decompresses to a
   terabyte of zeros.  Or you could send an email with a compressed
   packet that decompresses to...itself.

   How does that work?  The Lempel-Ziv compression language is
   powerful enough to write a quine -- that is, a program that prints
   its own source code.  Rather than repeat the story here, I'll defer
   to Russ Cox's article on how to write these:

      Russ Cox, `Zip Files All The Way Down', 2010-03-18.
      http://research.swtch.com/zip

   In the case of OpenPGP, it was particularly easy because OpenPGP
   supports a number of compression algorithms including an option
   without any CRC, so one can write a program that just spits out an
   OpenPGP compression quine without iterating over CRCs or solving a
   horrible system of equations.

   The result is CVE-2013-4402, and the lesson is that systematic
   recursive compression is no good -- not only that it's not useful,
   but it is actively harmful.  It's especially harmful for programs
   that process input sent unsolicited from anywhere on the internet,
   namely mail readers.

   And OpenPGP isn't the only data format that supports recursive
   compression.  PGP/MIME, which recursively interleaves MIME entities
   and OpenPGP packets, can probably exhibit the same issue, and the
   small bound on recursion that GnuPG now imposes while processing
   packets will be thwarted by the interleaving.  S/MIME 3.1 supports
   a compressed data message type, although nobody seems to have
   implemented it.  I'm sure there are formats outside mail that can
   also involve recursive compression.  Which ones can you find?
---

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.