[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20261022094253.GL3542221@port70.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 11:42:53 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: mark.yang@....com
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] configure: add --sysconfdir for the dynamic
linker path file
* mark.yang@....com <mark.yang@....com> [2026-10-22 17:35:02 +0900]:
> The dynamic linker looks for ld-musl-$ARCH.path in ../etc relative
> to the directory of the program interpreter, so the location of the
> path file is tied to where the dynamic linker is installed. A system
> that puts /usr/lib/ld-musl-$ARCH.so.1 into PT_INTERP therefore reads
> /usr/etc/ld-musl-$ARCH.path, while its configuration lives in /etc.
why would you place ld.so in /usr/lib? that's an unusual setup.
what are you trying to do?
changing ld.so path for testing, isolation or custom sysroot is
fine, but then you would not use /usr/lib (nor any system wide
abs path). you can also symlink /usr/etc/foo to /etc/foo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
