[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05c332de-c446-4547-a648-fd7aae6d4c38@foss.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:27:28 -0500
From: Bill Roberts <bill.roberts@...s.arm.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: libc-testsuite: what is the license?
On 10/25/25 11:51 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * Bill Roberts <bill.roberts@...s.arm.com> [2025-10-23 18:37:53 -0500]:
>> 1. Is this the right testsuite for testing musl?
>> http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/libc-testsuite/
>>
>> 2. If so, what is the license and can someone add the LICENSE file?
>
> https://wiki.musl-libc.org/libc-test.html
>
> so we use libc-test (!= libc-testsuite),
Ooops, yeah I had that backwards in my email.
> but i'm not actively maintaining it now.
> there are forks with more tests e.g.
> https://github.com/Boeing/libc-test/tree/boeing-staging-next-libc-test
> that i planned to merge after review.
>
> i don't expect the code to be redistributed
> as binary or as part of some software
> (it is for testing) so a wide range of
> licenses are accepted, the default license
> is MIT.
Outside of this email, is this documented anywhere?
Thanks,
Bill
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
