Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 15:59:25 +0800 From: 王洪亮 <wanghongliang@...ngson.cn> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: add loongarch64 port 在 2022/4/1 上午2:47, Rich Felker 写道: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 02:20:51PM +0800, 王洪亮 wrote: >> 在 2022/3/29 下午4:26, Arnd Bergmann 写道: >>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:12 AM 王洪亮 <wanghongliang@...ngson.cn> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> we have published 0001-add-loongarch64-port-v2.patch in >>>> >>>> https://github.com/loongson/musl/tree/loongarch-v1.0. >>>> >>>> The patch v2 fixed the issues pointed out in v1. >>>> >>>> have any other issues to modify? >>> I see you still refer to the system calls that I asked to be removed from >>> the kernel: clone() and the old stat() family (pre-statx). Please use >>> only the system calls that are actually supported in mainline kernels, >>> otherwise it does not work. >> Hi, Arnd >> >> I understand the new system call is clone3() ? >> >> I found musl does not support the clone3() call now, I can implement the >> >> clone3() in LoongArch for future called. > The point isn't that there should be a clone3() function (there > shouldn't) but that __clone has to be implemented by making the > __NR_clone3 syscall not the (nonexistant) __NR_clone syscall. > Rich Hi, Rich I understand the meaning is that keep the architecture-independent code and the __clone input parameter unchanged,within the __clone, convert input parameter to clone3 parameter, and then __NR_clone3 syscall. will that confusion between clone and clone3? Hongliang Wang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.