Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 16:40:24 -0500 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: Matt Andrews <mattandrews@...il.com> Cc: "musl@...ts.openwall.com" <musl@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: Why does musl require another libc to be built (noob question) On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 08:28:54AM +1100, Matt Andrews wrote: > Lately I’ve been trying to cross compile musl with clang. It’s been a > really interesting process and everyone on this list has been really > helpful. > > I hope this isn’t too much of a silly question, but there’s a missing piece > to my understanding of the standard library and that is why you need > another libc to build it. I assumed that it is a self contained thing, > everything else depends on it. > > I’m sure there are very good reasons for needing another standard library > to build musl, but I’m not sure what they are and if anyone could let me > know that would greatly appreciated. It doesn't and I'm not sure where you got that idea. Can you explain what you mean? Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.