[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 13:56:26 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com, Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>,
Érico Nogueira <ericonr@...root.org>
Subject: Re: Re: freeswitch and musl 1.2.x (time64 most likely)
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 12:57:05PM +0200, Sebastian Kemper wrote:
> Am Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 09:00:43PM -0400 schrieb Rich Felker:
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 12:44:05AM +0200, Sebastian Kemper wrote:
> > > So OS time is correct. Something not working right with apr.
> >
> > Likely it is doing something bad bypassing the system headers and
> > declaring gettimeofday (wrongly) itself...
>
> I looked at APR source but it doesn't seem to redefine gettimeofday. It
> only uses it here:
I said declare, not define, as in omitting sys/time.h and making its
own declaration (or calling it without one). However AFAICT that
doesn't seem to be the case, unless APR_HAVE_SYS_TIME_H is
misdetected. You might check the disassembly of this file and see
what's actually getting called.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
