Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 18:45:42 +0300 From: Alexey Kodanev <aleksei.kodanev@...l-sw.com> To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] nice: return EPERM instead of EACCES On 29.06.2021 17:48, Rich Felker wrote: > Is there actually an issue here? setpriority is specified to fail with > EACCES already for this case; EPERM is only specified for targeting > other processes you don't have permission to target. Is Linux getting > this wrong for setpriority? No, it's fine for setpriority(), it just seems wrong for nice() to return EACCES in this case. LTP/nice04 test (setting nice(-10)) is failing with musl and POSIX indeed says that the errno should be EPERM, for nice().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.