Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 20:35:08 +0200 From: Helmut Grohne <helmut@...divi.de> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: 989746@...s.debian.org Subject: What is the status of musl and fts.h? Dear musl developers, As I proceeded to building libselinux, I ran into the well-known issue that musl does not include a fts.h header. This is documented in the musl faq at: https://wiki.musl-libc.org/faq.html#Q:-Why-is-%3Ccode%3Efts.h%3C/code%3E-not-included? Unfortunately, the answer seems slightly out of date. For one thing, glibc does include a fts64 variant these days. For another, most embedded distributions that do use musl seem to have set on an extra implementation: https://github.com/void-linux/musl-fts So it seems like everyone has agreed that there should be a fts implementation and that it can be bolted onto musl. That gives rise to the obvious question: Can musl-fts be merged into musl? Please Cc me in replies as I am not subscribed. Also please update the FAQ entry. Helmut
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.