Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 13:53:46 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com, Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>, Alexander Couzens <lynxis@...0.eu> Subject: Re: MUSL ignores__attribute__((constructor(priority))) ? On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 07:45:48PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 5/22/20 7:33 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 06:50:06PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: > >> Hi Rich, > >> > >> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 05:49:48PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > >>>> According to the OpenWRT build I have been provided by a 3rd party, it's > >>>> using musl-1-1.23. > >>> > >>> Can you confirm this to make sure we're not debugging an issue that's > >>> long since fixed? Run /lib/ld-musl-armhf.so.1 as a command and it will > >>> print its version. > >> > >> *sigh*. It was 1.1.20. This specific (vendor) OpenWRT tree was broken in that > >> it used the 1.1.20 source code but called the generated packages and > >> path names 1.1.23 :/ > >> > >> After updating the sources to actual 1.1.23, the constructor order is > >> correct and I can run the unmodified libraries + application just like > >> on glibc. > >> > >> Sorry for the noise then. Normally if something is named 1.1.23 you > >> assume it also is 1.1.23 inside... > > > > OK, I'll inquire with OpenWRT about what's going on here.. > > > Hi, > > Hauke here form OpenWrt, I am just reading this. ;-) > > OpenWrt never shipped musl 1.1.20 or 1.1.23 in any final release. > OpenWrt 19.07 uses musl 1.1.24 > OpenWrt 18.06 uses musl 1.1.19 > I also checked that this is really using this version and not just > claims to do so. > > I assume that some vendor forked a random OpenWrt master state and had a > problem with their broken application and "fixed" it by downgrading > musl, but they only changed the git commit hash which should be used > and not the version number. > > I saw that lynxis just send this patch to use the official tar.gz for > musl and not check musl out from git any more, I assume this is related > to this discussion: > https://firstname.lastname@example.org/ Thanks for the quick follow-up!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.