Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 23:28:38 +0200 From: Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@...il.com> To: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: loff_t definition in <fcntl.h> (vs. glibc in <sys/types.h>) Hi Rich, what is the reason for loff_t being defined in <fcntl.h> ? It was defined some time ago, in v0.9.5. glibc (and thus uclibc; + also Bionic) has it in <sys/types.h>, defined long time before. Who is correct? I guess loff_t not being posix, therefore it shouldn't be in <sys/types.h> ? I'm asking because it'd be nice to have it for both in single header (portability). Kind regards, Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.