Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:09:34 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Testing of musl * Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> [2019-10-16 07:44:49 -0400]: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 09:17:24AM +0200, Miroslav Chabrecek wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > > > I tried to run libc-tests (http://nsz.repo.hu/git/?p=libc-test;a=summary) > > on x86_64 architecture with musl library. > > In results, there are many FAILED tests: > > ~5 Compilation API errors > > ~5. Runtime errors > > ~ 182 Math precision errors you should grep out the lines starting with X from the math errors those are expected and harmless. (most of the other math errors are also expected, but i havent filtered them out yet for various reasons) > malloc-brk-fail and possibly a few other similar tests fail on some > systems but do not indicate a bug in musl; rather they indicate that > the test has some issues with how it evaluates what it's trying to > measure. i'd say it's a linux kernel bug. but since it's unlikely to be fixed i might need to find another way to test out-of-memory conditions.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.