[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 15:15:47 +0300
From: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fix risc64 user_regs_struct conflict with kernel header
Hi Rick,
On Tue, Aug 06 2019, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 08:51:14AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
>> Rename user_regs_struct following the example of s390 to avoid conflict
>> with the kernel asm/ptrace.h header.
>> ---
>> arch/riscv64/bits/user.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h b/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h
>> index bd0f0fc7027f..097c7ad6ce18 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h
>> +++ b/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h
>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> -struct user_regs_struct {
>> +struct _user_regs_struct {
>> unsigned long pc;
>> unsigned long ra;
>> unsigned long sp;
>
> Does this agree with glibc naming?
glibc riscv headers do not define user_regs_struct.
baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@...s.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
