|
|
Message-ID: <20190806121047.GT9017@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 08:10:47 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fix risc64 user_regs_struct conflict with
kernel header
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 08:51:14AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Rename user_regs_struct following the example of s390 to avoid conflict
> with the kernel asm/ptrace.h header.
> ---
> arch/riscv64/bits/user.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h b/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h
> index bd0f0fc7027f..097c7ad6ce18 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv64/bits/user.h
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -struct user_regs_struct {
> +struct _user_regs_struct {
> unsigned long pc;
> unsigned long ra;
> unsigned long sp;
> --
> 2.20.1
Does this agree with glibc naming?
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.