Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 12:45:20 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Support SIGEV_THREAD_ID On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 06:24:31PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * James Y. Knight: > > > There seems to be some debate in glibc over whether this API should be > > supported, due to the long-standing debate about "pthread_t" vs > > "kernel tid" APIs. (And this API uses kernel tids, of course.) > > The debate is over and has been decided in favor of supporting TIDs. We > just have a backlog of interfaces for which we need to add support. > > Fortunately, C++ is standardizing stackless coroutines, so this has not > been proven to be a mistake. Good to know. I think we can go forward with doing the same then, providing the interfaces to get and use tids. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.