[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 12:45:20 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Support SIGEV_THREAD_ID
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 06:24:31PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * James Y. Knight:
>
> > There seems to be some debate in glibc over whether this API should be
> > supported, due to the long-standing debate about "pthread_t" vs
> > "kernel tid" APIs. (And this API uses kernel tids, of course.)
>
> The debate is over and has been decided in favor of supporting TIDs. We
> just have a backlog of interfaces for which we need to add support.
>
> Fortunately, C++ is standardizing stackless coroutines, so this has not
> been proven to be a mistake.
Good to know. I think we can go forward with doing the same then,
providing the interfaces to get and use tids.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
