Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:24:31 +0200 From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com> To: James Y Knight <jyknight@...gle.com> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Support SIGEV_THREAD_ID * James Y. Knight: > There seems to be some debate in glibc over whether this API should be > supported, due to the long-standing debate about "pthread_t" vs > "kernel tid" APIs. (And this API uses kernel tids, of course.) The debate is over and has been decided in favor of supporting TIDs. We just have a backlog of interfaces for which we need to add support. Fortunately, C++ is standardizing stackless coroutines, so this has not been proven to be a mistake. Thanks, Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.