Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 14:52:07 +0200
From: Leah Neukirchen <leah@...u.org>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] define daddr_t type

Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> writes:

> On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 07:53:29AM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
>> Hi Rich,
>> 
>> ....
>> > > +++ b/include/sys/types.h
>> > > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ extern "C" {
>> > >  #define __NEED_clock_t
>> > >  #define __NEED_suseconds_t
>> > >  #define __NEED_blksize_t
>> > > +#define __NEED_daddr_t
>> ....
>> 
>> > daddr_t is not a standard type, so can't be exposed by default here
>> > (aside from the dubious "*_t is always reserved" rule), and it's only
>> So should it be wrapped by #if defined(_GNU_SOURCE) || defined(_BSD_SOURCE) ?
>> 
>> > proposed to be used in one header, so it doesn't belong in alltypes.h
>> > either.
>> Where should it be then? Shell I create bits/types.h for it?
>> The goal is to be loadable from <sys/types.h>
>
> Why? It's not a reasonable type for any application to use -- we've
> never gotten a report that something failed to build because of its
> absence, and even if we did, it would almost surely be a case of "fix
> the application".

FWIW, Void patches four packages that use daddr_t:

- gpart
- kpartx
- libtirpc
- sleuthkit

Additionally, five packages use caddr_t:

- ifenslave
- lwipv6
- macchanger
- sbcl
- virtuoso

-- 
Leah Neukirchen  <leah@...u.org>  http://leahneukirchen.org/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.