Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 19:52:25 -0300
From: Matias Fonzo <>
Subject: Re: Symbol versioning approximation trips on compat symbols

On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:57:54 -0600
"A. Wilcox" <> wrote:

> On 01/28/19 00:34, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > As I explained, precisely that is not the case because the main musl
> > user, Alpine Linux, builds musl with a broken toolchain that is not
> > properly targeted to musl's features.  I think the official musl
> > instructions have the same result.  
> *ahem* Adélie?  OpenWrt?  Void?  midipix?  morpheus?  Emscripten?
> Alpine hardly has a monopoly on usage of musl.
> Of course, since almost all of us follow the patches and configuration
> of m-c-m, that's a moot point.  But the idea that "musl == Alpine" is
> a harmful one, especially as the community continues to grow.

It should be nice if (if this is community-musl page) could
list all the distributions based on Musl (including Dragora,
Sabotage, ...) and all the cross-compiler projects, etc.  :-)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.