Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:57:54 -0600 From: "A. Wilcox" <awilfox@...lielinux.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Symbol versioning approximation trips on compat symbols On 01/28/19 00:34, Florian Weimer wrote: > As I explained, precisely that is not the case because the main musl > user, Alpine Linux, builds musl with a broken toolchain that is not > properly targeted to musl's features. I think the official musl > instructions have the same result. *ahem* Adélie? OpenWrt? Void? midipix? morpheus? Emscripten? Alpine hardly has a monopoly on usage of musl. Of course, since almost all of us follow the patches and configuration of m-c-m, that's a moot point. But the idea that "musl == Alpine" is a harmful one, especially as the community continues to grow. Best, --arw -- A. Wilcox (awilfox) Project Lead, Adélie Linux https://www.adelielinux.org Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.