[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:57:54 -0600
From: "A. Wilcox" <awilfox@...lielinux.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Symbol versioning approximation trips on compat symbols
On 01/28/19 00:34, Florian Weimer wrote:
> As I explained, precisely that is not the case because the main musl
> user, Alpine Linux, builds musl with a broken toolchain that is not
> properly targeted to musl's features. I think the official musl
> instructions have the same result.
*ahem* Adélie? OpenWrt? Void? midipix? morpheus? Emscripten?
Alpine hardly has a monopoly on usage of musl.
Of course, since almost all of us follow the patches and configuration
of m-c-m, that's a moot point. But the idea that "musl == Alpine" is a
harmful one, especially as the community continues to grow.
Best,
--arw
--
A. Wilcox (awilfox)
Project Lead, Adélie Linux
https://www.adelielinux.org
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
