Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 18:03:22 -0700
From: Sung-Taek Kim <>
To: "musl" <>
Subject: Re: libc-test on aarch64

---- On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 04:50:32 -0700 Szabolcs Nagy <> wrote ----
 > the current standard allows rounding functions to either 
 > consistently raise inexact or not raise exceptions for 
 > non-integer inputs.  the c code in musl was written so 
 > it raises inexact (following fdlibm convention), and the 
 > tests try to check for that. 
 > but the other way is correct too and ieee754-2008 made 
 > that a requirement and future c fp standard (ts 18661) 
 > will require that too, so eventually both the c code in 
 > musl and the test system should be fixed to check for that. 

In that case,  may I start looking into updating the test cases? 

Could you be kind enough to point out an entry point case with which I can work out from there on?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.