Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15f751aa880.1189c6663375165.5783643331307535869@pocketcluster.io>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 18:03:22 -0700
From: Sung-Taek Kim <stkim1@...ketcluster.io>
To: "musl" <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: libc-test on aarch64

---- On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 04:50:32 -0700 Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> wrote ----
 
 > the current standard allows rounding functions to either 
 > consistently raise inexact or not raise exceptions for 
 > non-integer inputs.  the c code in musl was written so 
 > it raises inexact (following fdlibm convention), and the 
 > tests try to check for that. 
 >  
 > but the other way is correct too and ieee754-2008 made 
 > that a requirement and future c fp standard (ts 18661) 
 > will require that too, so eventually both the c code in 
 > musl and the test system should be fixed to check for that. 
 >  

In that case,  may I start looking into updating the test cases? 

Could you be kind enough to point out an entry point case with which I can work out from there on?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.