Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 18:03:22 -0700 From: Sung-Taek Kim <stkim1@...ketcluster.io> To: "musl" <musl@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: libc-test on aarch64 ---- On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 04:50:32 -0700 Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> wrote ---- > the current standard allows rounding functions to either > consistently raise inexact or not raise exceptions for > non-integer inputs. the c code in musl was written so > it raises inexact (following fdlibm convention), and the > tests try to check for that. > > but the other way is correct too and ieee754-2008 made > that a requirement and future c fp standard (ts 18661) > will require that too, so eventually both the c code in > musl and the test system should be fixed to check for that. > In that case, may I start looking into updating the test cases? Could you be kind enough to point out an entry point case with which I can work out from there on?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.