Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:31:27 +0200 From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com> To: mzpqnxow <musl@...qnxow.com> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> Subject: Re: Issues building gdbserver with musl Hello, On Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:50:59 -0400, mzpqnxow wrote: > FWIW, the following is the patch I came up with for PPC- it was very, very > short: > > diff -Naur gdb-7.12/gdb/gdbserver/linux-ppc-low.c > gdb-7.12-ppc-patched/gdb/gdbserver/linux-ppc-low.c > --- gdb-7.12/gdb/gdbserver/linux-ppc-low.c 2016-08-01 11:50:20.000000000 > -0400 > +++ gdb-7.12-ppc-patched/gdb/gdbserver/linux-ppc-low.c 2017-05-15 > 13:40:22.073884258 -0400 > @@ -21,7 +21,9 @@ > #include "linux-low.h" > > #include <elf.h> > +#define __ASSEMBLY__ > #include <asm/ptrace.h> > +#undef __ASSEMBLY__ Can we upstream something like this? What is the explanation why musl needs such a patch and not glibc/uclibc? Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.