[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 22:52:19 +0000
From: Justin Cormack <justin@...cialbusservice.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: libstdc++ namespace pollution
On 3 January 2017 at 21:35, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:16:29PM +0000, Justin Cormack wrote:
>> On 3 January 2017 at 18:29, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 05:44:47PM +0000, Justin Cormack wrote:
>> >> I have been trying to build a C++ program recently, and came across
>> >> the issue that
>> >>
>> >> 1. libstdc++ always defines _GNU_SOURCE see
>> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq.html#faq.predefined
>> >> 2. Musl defines pretty much everything once _GNU_SOURCE is defined
>> >
>> > So does glibc. :)
>>
>> This particular issue only happens with Musl, it includes more...
>
> That might be a bug/unwanted behavior on musl's side then. Could you
> help me check? I'd be happy to remove namespace-polluting cruft that's
> not actually needed to meet what applications can reasonably expect
> from _GNU_SOURCE.
>
This minimal test case compiles with c++ on Debian but not on Alpine:
#include <signal.h>
class ArgumentParser_x64 {
enum Register {
REG_A,
REG_B,
REG_C,
REG_D,
REG_SI,
REG_DI,
REG_BP,
REG_SP,
REG_8,
REG_9,
REG_10,
REG_11,
REG_12,
REG_13,
REG_14,
REG_15,
REG_RIP,
};
};
main() {}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
