[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:35:52 -0500
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: libstdc++ namespace pollution
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:16:29PM +0000, Justin Cormack wrote:
> On 3 January 2017 at 18:29, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 05:44:47PM +0000, Justin Cormack wrote:
> >> I have been trying to build a C++ program recently, and came across
> >> the issue that
> >>
> >> 1. libstdc++ always defines _GNU_SOURCE see
> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq.html#faq.predefined
> >> 2. Musl defines pretty much everything once _GNU_SOURCE is defined
> >
> > So does glibc. :)
>
> This particular issue only happens with Musl, it includes more...
That might be a bug/unwanted behavior on musl's side then. Could you
help me check? I'd be happy to remove namespace-polluting cruft that's
not actually needed to meet what applications can reasonably expect
from _GNU_SOURCE.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
