[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 16:44:44 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: John Mudd <johnbmudd@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Re: 32 bit musl?
* John Mudd <johnbmudd@...il.com> [2016-10-09 10:29:02 -0400]:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 9:55 PM, John Mudd <johnbmudd@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Rich's musl-cross-make builds 32-bit executables that use musl libs. It
> > kills two birds with one stone. That's great.
> >
> > But it appears to expect musl libc to be installed in /lib for dynamically
> > linked executables. That's not an option for me. Is there a way I can
> > override this?
> >
> >
> Thanks Laurent, I used symbolic link in /lib for testing on my development
> machine. That works well. But I don't have reasonable access to root user
> when I deploy for production.
deploy static linked binary or use explicit -Wl,-dynamic-linker
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
