Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 10:29:02 -0400 From: John Mudd <johnbmudd@...il.com> To: musl <musl@...ts.openwall.com> Cc: John Mudd <johnbmudd@...il.com> Subject: Re: 32 bit musl? On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 9:55 PM, John Mudd <johnbmudd@...il.com> wrote: > Rich's musl-cross-make builds 32-bit executables that use musl libs. It > kills two birds with one stone. That's great. > > But it appears to expect musl libc to be installed in /lib for dynamically > linked executables. That's not an option for me. Is there a way I can > override this? > > Thanks Laurent, I used symbolic link in /lib for testing on my development machine. That works well. But I don't have reasonable access to root user when I deploy for production. Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.