Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:51:50 -0700 From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: lowrisc-dev@...ts.lowrisc.org Subject: Re: [GSoC2016] Weekly Report of Porting musl to RISC-V Project #4 On Jun 26, 2016 9:12 AM, "Rich Felker" <dalias@...c.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 06:30:17PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > > * Masanori Ogino <masanori.ogino@...il.com> [2016-06-18 22:21:58 +0900]: > > > This week, I have tried to run libc-test  on Spike with the > > > musl-based toolchain, but not succeeded. I found a minor problem with > > > recent cpp (I will report it to the maintainer of libc-test later) but > > > > you have to s/-E/-E -P/ in the makefile > > > > i was reluctant to do this upstream as it is a non-standard flag. Just pin minimum gcc version to 5 > > If gcc isn't planning to fix this, I think we should find a good > out-of-the-box workaround in libc-test. That would probably be either > a probe for gcc needing -P, or a filter to undo whatever mangling gcc > does without -P. It seems like a fairly trivial sed script could do > the latter. > > Rich Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.