Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:12:24 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: lowrisc-dev@...ts.lowrisc.org Subject: Re: [GSoC2016] Weekly Report of Porting musl to RISC-V Project #4 On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 06:30:17PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > * Masanori Ogino <masanori.ogino@...il.com> [2016-06-18 22:21:58 +0900]: > > This week, I have tried to run libc-test  on Spike with the > > musl-based toolchain, but not succeeded. I found a minor problem with > > recent cpp (I will report it to the maintainer of libc-test later) but > > you have to s/-E/-E -P/ in the makefile > > i was reluctant to do this upstream as it is a non-standard flag. If gcc isn't planning to fix this, I think we should find a good out-of-the-box workaround in libc-test. That would probably be either a probe for gcc needing -P, or a filter to undo whatever mangling gcc does without -P. It seems like a fairly trivial sed script could do the latter. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.