[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:12:24 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: lowrisc-dev@...ts.lowrisc.org
Subject: Re: [GSoC2016] Weekly Report of Porting musl to RISC-V
Project #4
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 06:30:17PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * Masanori Ogino <masanori.ogino@...il.com> [2016-06-18 22:21:58 +0900]:
> > This week, I have tried to run libc-test [1] on Spike with the
> > musl-based toolchain, but not succeeded. I found a minor problem with
> > recent cpp (I will report it to the maintainer of libc-test later) but
>
> you have to s/-E/-E -P/ in the makefile
>
> i was reluctant to do this upstream as it is a non-standard flag.
If gcc isn't planning to fix this, I think we should find a good
out-of-the-box workaround in libc-test. That would probably be either
a probe for gcc needing -P, or a filter to undo whatever mangling gcc
does without -P. It seems like a fairly trivial sed script could do
the latter.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
