Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:45:56 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: New Exherbo+musl stage: x86_64-pc-linux-musl-20160621 On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 05:59:44PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 22/06/16 17:57, Matias A. Fonzo wrote: > > El Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:32:47 +0200 > > Shiz <hi@...z.me> escribió: > >>> On 22 Jun 2016, at 17:20, Matias A. Fonzo <selk@...gora.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> Distribute files and impose to your users in having xz, is a bad > >>> idea. > >> > >> I don’t think you understand what I said. Technical arguments about > >> the superiority of your format aren’t particularly relevant if the > >> user can’t decompress it in the first place. > >> > >> - Shiz > >> > > > > I understand that you are losing in make the right thing just for the > > availability of a bad implementation. If the user can't decompress is > > really your main concern, think in the RAM usage as a possible > > limitation (among other things). > > > > The format seems a little too new and you seem to derail the discussion > in a mailing list unrelated to the main project (exherbo). > > Would you please stop flaming? I'd like to second this. The discussion about xz is irrelevant to the thread it was posted on and to this list. It might be relevant on the Exherbo lists (up to them to decide) but the post here was just announcing a release of a distro using musl, not soliciting input for that distro's choice of archive format. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.