Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 16:11:32 +0100 From: Jeroen Ketema <jeroen@...eplay.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: C11 support Hi Rich, Thanks for your quick answer. I'm using clang 3.8 and up, which comes with its own stdatomic.h, so I should be fine in regard to that header. Best, Jeroen On 21/06/16 16:04, Rich Felker wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 02:53:31PM +0100, Jeroen Ketema wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm wondering to what extent musl supports C11? The FAQ only >> mentions that I need at a C99 compiler, and says that musl >> implements C and POSIX standards, but it doesn't mention which >> versions of standards. > musl only requires a C99-conforming compiler to build, but provides a > C11 library environment. Completeness of C11 support is also dependent > on compiler features (you can't get full C11 just by having library > support if the compiler is lacking C11 features) and stdatomic.h in > particular has to be provided externally (either by the compiler or > the slightly-portable stdatomic.h proposed on the list but not > included in musl at this time). > > Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.