Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:48:47 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: checked C (clang) vs musl? * Jens Staal <staal1978@...il.com> [2016-06-16 17:35:07 +0200]: > and apparently they have made a modified llvm/clang for checked C. > https://github.com/Microsoft/checkedc-clang > > anyone tested this vs musl? i thought it would need a lot of annotations to be useful.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.