Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:04:13 +0200
From: Jens Staal <>
Subject: Re: checked C (clang) vs musl?

On torsdag 16 juni 2016 kl. 17:48:47 CEST Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * Jens Staal <> [2016-06-16 17:35:07 +0200]:
> > and apparently they have made a modified llvm/clang for checked C.
> >
> > 
> > anyone tested this vs musl?
> i thought it would need a lot of annotations to be useful.

It introduces some new types etc, but I thought it also analyzed existing 
vanilla C code for unsafe behaviour. I just saw the news so I have not really 
read up on it, but was curious to know if someone had.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.