Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:04:13 +0200 From: Jens Staal <staal1978@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: checked C (clang) vs musl? On torsdag 16 juni 2016 kl. 17:48:47 CEST Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > * Jens Staal <staal1978@...il.com> [2016-06-16 17:35:07 +0200]: > > and apparently they have made a modified llvm/clang for checked C. > > https://github.com/Microsoft/checkedc-clang > > > > anyone tested this vs musl? > > i thought it would need a lot of annotations to be useful. It introduces some new types etc, but I thought it also analyzed existing vanilla C code for unsafe behaviour. I just saw the news so I have not really read up on it, but was curious to know if someone had.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.